David Thomson
725 Franklyn Road
Kelowna, BC no code – non-commercial
(250) 765-6826
March 7th 2006.
Christine Fraser – Investigative Officer
Ministry of Employment and Income
Assistance
Prevention and Loss Management
Services
303 – 1664 Richter Street
Kelowna,
B.C. V8W-9V6 Via
Fax: (250) 712-7552
Re: Your letter dated February 28th,
2006.
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/Christine_Fraser_Investigative_Officer.html
Dear Christine Fraser;
With all due
respect,
I
write to you, Christine Fraser, the private woman, for surely whatever you do
in your public capacity, it is you, Christine Fraser, the private woman that
acts or fails to act.
Let me begin by pointing out that I came
by my disability status,
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/SmithExhibitH.JPG, the victim of
criminal fraud…
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/davesweb.html.
More recently, I’ve become the victim of
extortion, threatening my economic security and also my right to free speech.
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/Roy_Sommerey.html.
As is plain to see, it’s caused me much
duress in a myriad of ways, such as disqualifying my eligibility for the
provincial Tax Deferral Program.
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/Tax_Deferral_No_Jan18_06Reply.htm
As for your letter, now posted on my
site, you make it clear in your second to last paragraph that should I fail to
comply with your demands, I risk the withholding of my benefits. Clearly, you
put me in a position of further duress.
Is your demand that I return to you, no
later than March 15th, 2006, your attached “RELEASE OF
INFORMATION” form, seeking my permission to make inquiries
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/Christine_Release_Info_Form.JPG
to be sure not to be violating my right to privacy?
The tone of your letter is reminiscent of
my previous dealings with the various offices and affiliates of the MINISTRY
OF EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME ASSISTANCE, who’s policies repeatedly defy reason,
common sense, generally accepted accounting procedures and even the suggested
mandate of your presiding ministry, who expect people with disabilities to
survive on less that half of what the poverty level is pegged at…
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/No_Taxable_Income.html
The tone of your letter implies that I am guilty unless I prove myself, innocent. It would appear that you are violating another of my fundamental rights. Were it not for the serious consequential harm that I face, I would find your investigation, laughable.
Imagine; you justifying your comparably handsomely-paid position, paid to investigate the possibility that I might have some investment squirreled away with Interior Savings Credit Union, my financial institution and mortgager for the last 20 years, who now refuse to extend me a paltry 10 grand to pay the extortion to get those threatening liens removed from my home. Rather, they force me to find alternative first-mortgage financing and then try to penalize me 4 grand more for “early pay-out”.
Add to that, the fact that my home (recently appraised at $ 223,000.00) sold for $ 7,600.00 in a recent municipal tax sale, subsequent to my repeated rejected applications to the Tax Deferral Program. Interior Savings did finally thwart the sale within the prescribed time frame, by paying the delinquent taxes, interest and penalties, totaling twice the amount of the original delinquent taxes.
Consider also, my unlawful arrest and confinement, under threat, duress, protest and intimidation…
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/UtteringThreats.JPG
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/RestrainingOrder.JPG
Contrary to procedure, wherein Crown Counsel files the charge, having decided if:
a) It’s in the best interest of the public and
b) There’s enough evidence to convict.
Two critical tests, both based on the report, submitted by the arresting officer. On appearing at the courthouse at the prescribed time to “face my accuser(s)”, I learned that:
a) My name was nowhere to be found on the docket and
b) Crown Counsel never received any report on which to move forward on.
Nobody knew anything about it…
It appears quite evident that charges of public mischief, levied against my accuser(s) should be considered.
Let’s look at “the players”, shall we:
Al Horning, my MLA. http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/MyPlatform1.html
Grant Hardwick - http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/biggerman.html
and his “bat”, Roy Sommerey - http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org\Gomery2.JPG
who among others, collaborate in criminal fraud and extortion, aimed at me, all having reason and all having demonstrated a desire to silence me…
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/Application to a Judge.html.
I’m compelled to ask, would you and
others be relying on Section 15 of the Criminal code of Canada, “OBEDIENCE
TO DE FACTO GOVERNMENTS”?
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/180710.html#Section-15
Most assuredly, that Section is in
violation of an integral Principle of Nuremberg, wherein it was
decided, “I was only following orders”, is just no excuse.
Could
it be, Christine that you are no more than the pointy end of a stick, no more
than a tool to beat me into submission, punitive damages for my speaking out?
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/MyPlatform.html
Back to your letter - Contrary to your assertion that “All information affecting eligibility must be reported on a monthly basis”; it’s my understanding that it is unnecessary to report, monthly, no change, including any change, so minor as to have no effect on my eligibility.
The only change since my last reporting
would be the $ 50.00 per month increase in rent that I passed on to my
tenant/room-mate, as of January 1st, now at $ 450.00, still
acceptable within your policy guidelines, having no effect on my eligibility
for benefits.
See rental receipts for January 2005 and
January 2006, reflecting the change.
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/Rent_Receipts.JPG
In response to your request for clarity
regarding my “rental income”, my tenant/roommate has sole possession of the
basement of my home, save for when I must enter his premises to light and
maintain the wood-stove. I have sole possession of the main floor, save when my
roommate/tenant wishes to use the oven. Please consider this, my reporting of
the change, though it is of no effect.
It’s not as if I have anything to hide; I
don’t but I find your proposed investigation to be illegitimate, an insult to
my intelligence, my integrity and my dignity, never mind those most obvious
violations of my Charter Rights and Freedoms (1982).
As you peruse the documents that I have referred to, all published on my website, I urge you, Christine, to look to your personal sense of moral judgment and recognize your own moral duty as it presides above all policies that appear contradictory to your own sense of fair and just treatment. Please recognize Christine, the dire consequences, sure to prevail unless we collectively and conscientiously exercise our moral duties over unreasonable policies, imposed in more ever-alarming scenarios…
http://british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org/Our_Global_Village.html
Just what kind of legacy do you wish to
leave your children?
Let me hear back from you by letter.
Yours very truly,
David Thomson
c.c. Roy Sommerey, Allen Seckel, Phil
Smith, Jim Fenton, et al.
